taok1 sgrnas (Addgene inc)
Structured Review

Taok1 Sgrnas, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 3004 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/taok1+sgrnas/pX330-U6-Chimeric_BB-CBh-hSpCas9+(Plasmid+%2342230)/bio_rxiv__2025__10__14__682031-216-11-18
Average 96 stars, based on 3004 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "TAOK1 regulates chemo- and radiosensitivity in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors"
Article Title: TAOK1 regulates chemo- and radiosensitivity in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.1101/2025.10.14.682031
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic outline of the kinome shRNA and whole genome CRISPR-Cas9 screens. ( B ) Volcano plot representing gene summary of MAGeCK analysis of the kinome shRNA screens in KB2P-1.21 cells treated with olaparib. ( C ) Volcano plot representing gene summary of MAGeCK analysis of the whole genome CRISPR-Cas9 screens in RPE1-hTERT BRCA1 -/- ;p53 -/- cells treated with 2 Gy IR. ( D, E ) Growth assays in KB2P-3.4 (D) or KB1P-G3 (E) Taok1 -/- cell lines treated with the indicated doses of olaparib (D) or IR (E). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. ( F ) Representative images of growth assays in KB1P-G3 NT, Taok1 -/- with empty rescue construct (pOZ-empty) or Taok1 full cDNA rescue construct (pOZ-Taok1) treated with the indicated doses of olaparib. ( G ) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of mice transplanted with KB1P-4S organoids with NT or Taok1 sgRNAs and treated with olaparib. Statistical analysis was performed with the log-rank test. ( H, I ) Growth assays in KB1P-G3 Taok1 -/- cell lines complemented with indicated rescue construct. Cells were treated with indicated doses of olaparib (H) or IR (I). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test.
Techniques Used: shRNA, CRISPR, Construct
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Volcano plot representing gene summary of MAGeCK analysis of the whole genome CRISPR-Cas9 screens in RPE1-hTERT BRCA1 -/- ;p53 -/- cells treated with 1 Gy IR. ( B-E ) Western blot analysis of TAOK1 protein expression of NT and TAOK1 KO in KB2P-3.4 (B), KB1P-G3 including HA-tagged, Taok1 cDNA rescue (pOZ-Taok1) (C), MDA-MB-436 (D) and KB2P-1.21 (E) cell lines. ( F ) TIDE analysis of polyclonal KB2P-1.21 cells. ( G, H ) Growth assays in KB1P-G3 NT, Taok1 -/- and Taok1 rescue cells treated with the indicated doses of olaparib (G) or talazoparib (H). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. ( I, J ) Growth assays in MDA-MB-436 NT and TAOK1 -/- cell lines treated with indicated doses of olaparib (I) or IR (J). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. ( K, L ) Growth assays in KB2P-1.21 NT and Taok1 sgRNA cells treated with the indicated doses of olaparib (K) or IR (L). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. ( M ) TIDE analysis of polyclonal KB1P-4S organoids. ( N ) Immunohistochemistry staining for TAOK1 of untreated BRCA1;p53-deficient mouse mammary tumors with NT or Taok1 sgRNA. ( O ) Olaparib response of KB1P-4S organoids transduced with NT or Taok1 sgRNAs. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test.
Techniques Used: CRISPR, Western Blot, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Staining, Transduction
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A-C ) Quantification (A, B) and representative images (C) of growth assays in KB1P-G3B1 WT (A) and KB1P-G3 WT and Taok1 -/- cells treated with the indicated doses of CP 43 and olaparib. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. ( D ) Western blot analysis of expression level of HA-tagged Taok1 rescue constructs. ( E ) In vitro kinase assay of indicated KB1P-G3 cell lines. Protein was isolated from KB1P-G3 cell lines by co-IP with HA-tag. NT cell line was used as negative control with no HA-tag while the other cell lines expressed an HA-tag with the indicated construct. Bars represent mean ± SD, statistical analysis was done with two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. ( F, G ) Representative images of growth assay of KB1P-G3 NT, Taok1 -/- and Taok1 full cDNA rescue (pOZ-Taok1) or two different kinase mutants (pOZ-K57A, pOZ-D169A) and a double mutant (pOZ-K57A+D169A) treated with indicated doses of olaparib (F) or IR (G).
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Expressing, Construct, In Vitro, Kinase Assay, Isolation, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Negative Control, Growth Assay, Mutagenesis
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Graph representing percentage of cells with micronuclei upon 0.5 µM olaparib treatment for 48 h. Bars are plotted as mean ± SD, statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ( B ) Quantification of RAD51 foci formation upon 10 µM olaparib. Bars represent mean ± SD, statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ( C ) Representative images of RAD51 foci formation upon 10 µM olaparib in Brca1 reconstituted KB1P-G3B1, KB1P-G3 and KB2P-3.4 cell lines with the indicated modifications. ( D ) Quantification of DSB spectrum assay in HEK293T cells treated with the indicated siRNAs. Each dot represents an experiment ran in duplicates, bars represent mean ± SD, statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ( E ) Growth assays of KB1P-G3 NT, Taok1 -/- and TAOK1 rescue cells treated with the indicated doses of cisplatin. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test.
Techniques Used: Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Quantification of RAD51 foci formation 3 h post 10 Gy IR. Bars represent mean ± SD, statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ( B ) Verification of siRNA KD efficiency in HEK293T DSB-Spectrum_V1 cell line. ( C ) Growth assays with MDA-MB-436 NT and TAOK1 KO cell lines treated with the indicated doses of cisplatin. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. ( D, E ) Growth assays in KB1P-G3 NT, TAOK1 KO and Taok1 rescue cell lines treated with indicated doses of carboplatin (D) or oxaliplatin (E). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test.
Techniques Used: Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Representative images of IHC staining for TAOK1 on human tumor samples of prostate and lung showing variable nuclear and diffuse cytoplasmatic localization. ( B ) Representative images of IHC staining for TAOK1 on human tumor samples of prostate, bladder and ovary showing varying TAOK1 expression levels. ( C )Western blot analysis of KB1P-G3 NT samples of cytoplasmatic (C) and nuclear (N) fraction and Taok1 -/- whole cell lysate. ( D ) Representative images of immunofluorescence for cellular expression pattern of KB1P-G3 Taok1 -/- cells with HA-tagged pOZ-Taok1 rescue construct compared to pOZ-empty vector control. ( E ) Growth assay in KB1P-G3 NT, Taok1 -/- and Taok1 rescue cell lines treated with indicated doses of camptothecin. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. ( F ) Growth assay in KB2P-3.4 NT and Taok1 -/- clones treated with indicated doses of JH-RE-06 with or without olaparib (0.1 µM). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. ( G ) DNA fiber analysis in indicated cell lines with or without 4 mM HU treatment (3 h). Bar represents mean of IdU/CldU ratio of at least 250 fibers, statistical analysis was done with ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (H) DNA fiber analysis in indicated cell lines treated with 10 µM olaparib 2h prior and while labelling with CldU and IdU, ssDNA was digested with S1 nuclease if indicated. Bar represents the mean of IdU track length of at least 250 fibers, statistical analysis was done with ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
Techniques Used: Immunohistochemistry, Expressing, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence, Construct, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Growth Assay, Clone Assay, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Quantification of SIRF foci formation of HA-tagged TAOK1 with and without 2 mM HU. Bars represent mean ± SD, statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ( B ) Representative images of analysis shown in ( A ). ( C ) Volcano plot of mass spectrum analysis of TAOK1 co-IP samples from KB1P-G3 NT nuclear fraction compared to TAOK1 KO. Positive log2 fold change values indicate enrichment in the NT nuclear fraction compared to TAOK1 KO of four independent replicas. ( D ) Western blot of input and co-IP of KB1P-G3 NT and TAOK1 KO. Pulldown was performed with PCNA antibody. ( E ) Growth assay of KB1P-G3 NT, TAOK1 KO and TAOK1 rescue cells treated with topotecan at indicated doses. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. ( F ) Growth assay of KB1P-G3 NT, TAOK1 KO and TAOK1 rescue cells treated with JH-RE-06 alone or in combination with olaparib. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Western Blot, Growth Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Graph showing replication speed by total track length of untreated DNA fiber assay in KB1P-G3 NT and TAOK1 KO cells. Bar represents the mean of at least 250 fibers, statistical analysis was done with unpaired t-test. ( B ) DNA fiber analysis in indicated cell lines with or without 4 mM HU treatment. Bar represents the mean of IdU/CldU ratio of at least 300 fibers, statistical analysis was done with unpaired t-test. ( C ) DNA fiber analysis in indicated cell lines treated with 10 µM olaparib 2h prior and while labelling with CldU and IdU, ssDNA was digested with S1 nuclease if indicated. Bar represents the mean of IdU track length of at least 250 fibers, statistical analysis was done with ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ( D, E ) Quantification (D) and representative images (E) of immunofluorescence analysis of RPA foci formation in KB1P-G3 NT, TAOK1 KO and TAOK1 rescue cells upon olaparib treatment (10 µM for 16 h). Bars indicate the mean number of foci per nucleus of at least 1000 nuclei. Statistical analysis was done with ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (F) Western blot of input and co-IP of KB1P-G3 NT and TAOK1 rescue cells. Pulldown was performed with TRIM25 antibody. ( G, H ) Western blot of indicated KB1P-G3 (H) and MDA-MB-436 (I) cell lines for ISG15 protein levels. Cells were untreated or treated with 10 µM olaparib for 24 h. Vinculin was used as loading control. ( I, J ) Schematic predicting replication dynamics in presence (I) or absence of TAOK1 (J) in BRCA1/2-deficient cells. (I) TAOK1 interacts with PCNA and TRIM25 and does not allow alternative fork protection mechanisms or ssDNA gap repair in BRCA-deficient cells, leading to RF instability. (J) In the absence of TAOK1, increased ISG15 expression and potentially recruitment to RF activates fork protection and gap suppression mechanisms and thus, RF stability.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Immunofluorescence, Western Blot, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Control, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A, B ) Representative images (A) and quantification (B) of immunofluorescence analysis of RPA foci formation in KB2P-3.4 NT and Taok1 -/- cells upon olaparib treatment (10 µM for 16 h). Bars indicate mean number of foci per nucleus of at least 1000 nuclei. Statistical analysis was done with ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ( C, D ) Graph representing ssDNA intensity of native BrdU incorporation in KB1P-G3 (C) and MDA-MB-436 (D) cell lines. Cells were treated with 0.75 µM olaparib for 5 h. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test was used for statistical analysis. ( E ) Representative images of PLA assay between TRIM25 and HA-tag in KB1P-G3 NT and Taok1 rescue cells. ( F ) Kaplan-Meier curve of survival probability of SCAN-B dataset treated with non-chemotherapy. Statistical analysis was done with log-rank test.
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Comparison, BrdU Incorporation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A, B ) Analysis of the SCAN-B dataset for TAOK1 high or low expression. Kaplan-Meier curves for survival probability of all patients (A) and patients treated with chemotherapy specifically (B). Risk tables are shown below. Statistical analysis was done with log-rank test.
Techniques Used: Expressing
Related Articles
CRISPR:Article Title: TAOK1 regulates chemo- and radiosensitivity in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors Article Snippet: .. For CRISPR-Cas9 editing of human MDA-MB-436 cell line, NT sgRNA and Multiple Displacement Amplification:Article Title: TAOK1 regulates chemo- and radiosensitivity in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors Article Snippet: .. For CRISPR-Cas9 editing of human MDA-MB-436 cell line, NT sgRNA and Clone Assay:Article Title: TAOK1 regulates chemo- and radiosensitivity in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors Article Snippet: .. For CRISPR-Cas9 editing of human MDA-MB-436 cell line, NT sgRNA and |